your phone

[quote="TechnicalSuwako" pid='86814' dateline='1518803566']

$ 599 is about the price of a current flagship Android phone of most companies actually.
And the monitor is because if you connect the phone to an external display, mouse, and keyboard, you can use it as a full desktop PC.
It's the same thing Microsoft (Windows 10 Mobile) and Canonical (Ubuntu Touch) tried to achieve, except that since the phone already runs a full desktop OS, the OS you'll be using on the bigger display will be a full desktop OS as well.

But again, keep in mind that the processor will be an ARM processor, meaning that you'll only be able to run apps on it that are fully open source, or apps that have been pre-compiled for ARM processors (which is like 90% of the Linux desktop apps any way, but if you want to run more mainstream apps like Discord, Skype, Unity Engine, Maya (3D modelling software), or one of the many Windows apps under Wine or Mono, you're out of luck).
[/quote]

i like windows apps like photoshop, skype.
isn't windows 10 mobile, a failed product? no one likes it and the people i know avoids it like the plague it is. i like that it can be used as a desktop pc but i want more than 8gb ram and more than 2tb for harddrive for a desktop pc
 
yaoifangirl said:
i like windows apps like photoshop, skype.
isn't windows 10 mobile, a failed product? no one likes it and the people i know avoids it like the plague it is. i like that it can be used as a desktop pc but i want more than 8gb ram and more than 2tb for harddrive for a desktop pc
 
[quote="TechnicalSuwako" pid='86875' dateline='1518896247']

There is a Skype beta for Linux too, which is closed source and therefore not usable on that ARM-based phone.
Photoshop can often be used via Wine since it has a big fan base among Linux users while Adobe gives no even a single fuck about us, but since this phone is ARM based, same problems as with Skype.

Windows 10 Mobile has failed, but the PC functionality on it was really nothing more than a bigger version of Windows 10 Mobile with a desktop and the entire start screen hidden inside a start menu.
Other than that, it was the exact same OS, and therefore it was unable to run any kind of desktop app.
However, Microsoft was planning on bringing desktop apps (Win32) to this part of Windows 10 Mobile, but since they silently killed off the OS altogether, this will no longer happen.

As for your RAM and HDD requirements, it depends on your use case.
Linux generally uses far fewer RAM and CPU than Windows does.
But you might not need this much on an ARM-based phone, ARM processors have never been meant to use used for heavy desktop work any way.
[/quote]
sounds like a pain but alternatives always exist though they don't do a good job. why won't they take more ram and cpu time? i googled arm and it looks complex
 
yaoifangirl said:
sounds like a pain but alternatives always exist though they don't do a good job. why won't they take more ram and cpu time? i googled arm and it looks complex

Because ARM was originally meant for portable devices only.
And alternatives often do their jobs better, just monopolies make sure you're never heard of it (and if you did, make it seem like a pain to use).
 
Elvis said:
Will it have an app store?

Linux doesn't need an app store, it already has software repositories for decades!
Like, you only have to type in a single command to install, update (and upgrade, depending on the distro), and remove packages, which is far more convenient than an app store (and at least it works).
Many distro's offer a GUI for that too, and if not then you can install one that's already made before.

And if not, then you can compile from source, or depending on the distro, download installable packages (Debian and Ubuntu use .deb files, Red Hat and Fedora use .rpm files, Arch and Manjaro don't have such a thing, but these already have an AUR that comes with the entire universe).
 
Not Linux. The smartphone you linked. Will it have a place from where to download and install apps? Otherwise it's just a smartphone for tech-savvy people.
 
Elvis said:
Not Linux. The smartphone you linked. Will it have a place from where to download and install apps? Otherwise it's just a smartphone for tech-savvy people.

This is exactly what I've been explaining you all the time; this smartphone runs Pure OS by default, which is a Debian-based Linux distro.
Therefore, it already has access to millions of apps that have been created over the past 2 decades.

Debian comes with the "apt" command for this, with a graphical shell for it being "aptitude".
But it's very possible they'll make something that's easier to use, like how Ubuntu has their own "Ubuntu Software Centre" (though "apt" is still recommended over that, because Ubuntu Software Centre is quite a buggy mother fucker).
 
TechnicalSuwako said:
The problem with Android's version of open source is that its source code is read-only to the public, so no outside contributions are possible.
Additionally, Android-based drivers and many apps (including Google's own apps) are closed source.
Both of which already go against the principles of open source software.

I feel the only reason why Android is open source is because it uses the Linux kernel under the hood, which is GPL2 licensed, and therefore forces people who use Linux code to make their code open source as well, plus they have to credit the original coders too.


I haven't heard anything about Google Glass for years now, I wonder if they still consider releasing it or not.

They would release it albeit the protests after some modifications. It's good technology to be ignored.
Would you buy one?
 
[quote="TechnicalSuwako" pid='88080' dateline='1520700106']

Trying to trust Google to not steal my private information and sell it to advertisers is like trying to convince a serial killer with 20+ years of non-stop killing and dodging justice to stop killing people and hand themself over at own will.
In other words, no.
[/quote]

That's a strange comparison if ever heard one. If that data for advertisements doesn't suit you then stop buying anything and stop clicking on them. You shouldn't bother anything else with them
 
KuranKaname said:
That's a strange comparison if ever heard one. If that data for advertisements doesn't suit you then stop buying anything and stop clicking on them. You shouldn't bother anything else with them
 
Websites with the encryption are good enough to user for secure information. I use https websites and I check the URL. What more can be done? It's totally secure
 
KuranKaname said:
Websites with the encryption are good enough to user for secure information. I use https websites and I check the URL. What more can be done? It's totally secure

Are you sure that websites being "https" alone will magically protect you against the entire universe?
https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/phishing-safety-is-https-enough/

And another point of concern is how this guy explains that encryption in each HTTPS protocol was written by the NSA, which is anything but protecting your information, and therefore them creating something that would really protect your information is a contradiction to their core business (it's common for US officials to contradict themselves all the time any way).
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
TechnicalSuwako said:
Are you sure that websites being "https" alone will magically protect you against the entire universe?
https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/phishing-safety-is-https-enough/

And another point of concern is how this guy explains that encryption in each HTTPS protocol was written by the NSA, which is anything but protecting your information, and therefore them creating something that would really protect your information is a contradiction to their core business (it's common for US officials to contradict themselves all the time any way).
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Can free certificates expire? Many are providing them for free. I didn't know about fake certificates until now. It's just didn't cross my mind at all. Predicting numbers thing in that video, I didn't get it. I didn't get that mim can't be prevented with https.
 
KuranKaname said:
Can free certificates expire? Many are providing them for free. I didn't know about fake certificates until now. It's just didn't cross my mind at all. Predicting numbers thing in that video, I didn't get it. I didn't get that mim can't be prevented with https.
 
Back
Top