Elvis
V.I.P. Member
TechnicalSuwako said:Actually, Microsoft did do their best when they were still maintaining Windows Phone 7, 8, 8.1, and Windows 10 Mobile.
TechnicalSuwako said:Actually, Microsoft did do their best when they were still maintaining Windows Phone 7, 8, 8.1, and Windows 10 Mobile.
yaoifangirl said:is it expensive? i want one of it's cost is less and if the political discussions are not banned in this forum, i would have things to share about that spying
TechnicalSuwako said:You can see it in more details by yourself:
https://puri.sm/shop/librem-5/
yaoifangirl said:it's expensive. i don't think i could afford even just phone.. what's with the monitor?
yaoifangirl said:i like windows apps like photoshop, skype.
isn't windows 10 mobile, a failed product? no one likes it and the people i know avoids it like the plague it is. i like that it can be used as a desktop pc but i want more than 8gb ram and more than 2tb for harddrive for a desktop pc
yaoifangirl said:sounds like a pain but alternatives always exist though they don't do a good job. why won't they take more ram and cpu time? i googled arm and it looks complex
TechnicalSuwako said:You can see it in more details by yourself:
https://puri.sm/shop/librem-5/
Elvis said:Will it have an app store?
Elvis said:Not Linux. The smartphone you linked. Will it have a place from where to download and install apps? Otherwise it's just a smartphone for tech-savvy people.
TechnicalSuwako said:The problem with Android's version of open source is that its source code is read-only to the public, so no outside contributions are possible.
Additionally, Android-based drivers and many apps (including Google's own apps) are closed source.
Both of which already go against the principles of open source software.
I feel the only reason why Android is open source is because it uses the Linux kernel under the hood, which is GPL2 licensed, and therefore forces people who use Linux code to make their code open source as well, plus they have to credit the original coders too.
I haven't heard anything about Google Glass for years now, I wonder if they still consider releasing it or not.
KuranKaname said:They would release it albeit the protests after some modifications. It's good technology to be ignored.
Would you buy one?
KuranKaname said:That's a strange comparison if ever heard one. If that data for advertisements doesn't suit you then stop buying anything and stop clicking on them. You shouldn't bother anything else with them
KuranKaname said:Websites with the encryption are good enough to user for secure information. I use https websites and I check the URL. What more can be done? It's totally secure
TechnicalSuwako said:Are you sure that websites being "https" alone will magically protect you against the entire universe?
https://blog.trendmicro.com/trendlabs-security-intelligence/phishing-safety-is-https-enough/
And another point of concern is how this guy explains that encryption in each HTTPS protocol was written by the NSA, which is anything but protecting your information, and therefore them creating something that would really protect your information is a contradiction to their core business (it's common for US officials to contradict themselves all the time any way).
KuranKaname said:Can free certificates expire? Many are providing them for free. I didn't know about fake certificates until now. It's just didn't cross my mind at all. Predicting numbers thing in that video, I didn't get it. I didn't get that mim can't be prevented with https.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.