Burnsy
V.I.P. Member
Star_Of_Hope said:I do understand your point, Risk.
But it defeats the forum purpose
Star_Of_Hope said:I do understand your point, Risk.
But it defeats the forum purpose
Star_Of_Hope said:Do we have this anywhere else?
We might be a small forum but still we need to follow things.
BurnsyCEO said:What are you even talking about. What does that have to do with this?
Star_Of_Hope said:Well, does other forums allow these duplicate threads?
If so, can consider them otherwise there is no point to it
Risk said:I'm only apart of one other forum so I don't know how common it is but they ban people for bumping old threads which is why I find it so weird that it is allowed here.
Star_Of_Hope said:Well, does other forums allow these duplicate threads?
If so, can consider them otherwise there is no point to it
Risk said:I know but its just such a bigger site they don't have time to waste explaining to each individual what rule they broke but I'm not suggesting we ban people here.
I mean I don't mind some old threads but the ones you said are the main ones I'm against.
Star_Of_Hope said:I suppose we can do that.
We will be locking all the polls, recommendations threads for group watch. Well, we will be locking the feedback threads as well.
I hope it should be good enough like BurnsyCEO suggested above.
Elvis said:I completely disagree with this suggestion. Thread necromancy is one of the most useful ways to increase activity on forums. I know this for a fact after having administrated forums and studied online communities for several years.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.