Light novel popularity is popular than anime and manga

That’s because you never explained why having pictures makes it a superior product. I repeatedly asked why it’s superior, and you never explained why. You just kept repeatedly saying “it’s obvious” and “it has pictures”. That doesn’t explain why manga is a superior product.

You made a declarative statement with nothing to back it up. When you make declarative statements, you need to put some thought and logic behind it. Not just pull it out of thin air and rely on “it’s obvious”, because it’s never going to be obvious for everyone.

So I’m asking her again, why does having pictures make it a superior product?
I was assuming a better representation would make things better and it deserves a better popularity but I failed to notice that without the visual representation or can gain even more popularity based on the creativity of the mind
 
I was assuming a better representation would make things better and it deserves a better popularity but I failed to notice that without the visual representation or can gain even more popularity based on the creativity of the mind
How does having pictures make it better? Or was that the only difference you could find and you just ran with it?
 
How does having pictures make it better? Or was that the only difference you could find and you just ran with it?
Don't just limit it to having pictures. I am emphasizing on actual representation and art. Compared to words I believe a picture can describe the situation and scenes more accurately
 
Don't just limit it to having pictures. I am emphasizing on actual representation and art. Compared to words I believe a picture can describe the situation and scenes more accurately
Your interpretation of visual representation isn’t what the word actually means, and you seem to be using it as a fancy label for “it has pictures”. So saying visual representation and art is pretty redundant.
 
Your interpretation of visual representation isn’t what the word actually means, and you seem to be using it as a fancy label for “it has pictures”. So saying visual representation and art is pretty redundant.
That's why I admitted earlier that it could my misconception thinking that a better depiction thorough a visual representation should have been way popular than the light novel which uses mere words.
 
That's why I admitted earlier that it could my misconception thinking that a better depiction thorough a visual representation should have been way popular than the light novel which uses mere words.
I don’t think you caught on to what I was saying. You were telling me that visual representation doesn’t just mean pictures, it also includes the art. I was criticizing you for being redundant.

It’s like talking about sound design and you’re separating sound and audio. All you did was hit up a thesaurus. Your sentence won’t sound fancier if you hit up a thesaurus and add multiple variations of the same word.
 
I don’t think you caught on to what I was saying. You were telling me that visual representation doesn’t just mean pictures, it also includes the art. I was criticizing you for being redundant.

It’s like talking about sound design and you’re separating sound and audio. All you did was hit up a thesaurus. Your sentence won’t sound fancier if you hit up a thesaurus and add multiple variations of the same word.
I did admit that I was wrong to think a visual representation of scenes and emotional moments (black lines on one's face etc.,) might not be for everyone and I shouldn't judge that for popularity. So what else would you want me to admit here and I haven't watched for any word but thanks for the compliment, even if it's just sarcastic remark from your side
 
Back
Top