Hardest programming language to learn

Claraviolet said:
Wait a sec ....
You are a computer science student right?
Did they allow you to do all the experiments just like that?
Click to expand...


Which is a different thing from what I was talking about.
And the size thing is really only with the "char" variable type, which isn't too bad any way.

Star_Of_Hope said:
That must be hard. Clara and shaurya enjoys programming and they like it. What about you? Do you like it? Or did you just happen to be in that field with no real choice?
Click to expand...

If I wouldn't enjoy programming, I wouldn't have done it for over a decade long.
Of course I enjoy it!
 
???????? said:
Which is a different thing from what I was talking about.
And the size thing is really only with the "char" variable type, which isn't too bad any way.


If I wouldn't enjoy programming, I wouldn't have done it for over a decade long.
Of course I enjoy it!
Click to expand...



Char, long, double the size is different. I am using plsql these days. So I will take an example from there number(20) is different from int in c. Right?

MadaraUchiha said:
No, Electronics and Communication.
Click to expand...
 
Claraviolet said:
Char, long, double the size is different. I am using plsql these days. So I will take an example from there number(20) is different from int in c. Right?
Click to expand...



We'll see.
 
SecretWish said:
i am with Demon_Skeith on this one. i don't know any so it would be everything for me too
Click to expand...

granted its not bad to learn, but it has to be a one on one learning experience.
 
Claraviolet said:
Char, long, double the size is different. I am using plsql these days. So I will take an example from there number(20) is different from int in c. Right?
Click to expand...


Long = bigger int.
Double = bigger float.

All 4 have unsigned and signed, default to unsigned, which give access to negative number too.
When not need and want bigger range on int or float instead, signed can be used.

Long and double give access to same numbers as int and float respectively and beyond, but if you only have the number "10", it should already have been clear that "int" is sufficient.
 
???????? said:
Long = bigger int.
Double = bigger float.

All 4 have unsigned and signed, default to unsigned, which give access to negative number too.
When not need and want bigger range on int or float instead, signed can be used.

Long and double give access to same numbers as int and float respectively and beyond, but if you only have the number "10", it should already have been clear that "int" is sufficient.
Click to expand...

Yup. When I learned it's size is 2 bytes. If I store a single digits then about the rest of the space?
Are you trying my point?
 
MadaraUchiha said:
No, it was an experiment we had to do. And then for a mini project assessment I used an arduino board for more options.


I realise that but it puts our life in hell doesn't it. Initially at least. I was really glad that I didn't have to deal with it again.
C was comparatively easier. I was able to work around AVR and such in a better way.
Click to expand...
 
Seeing the title, I thought, just maybe I could read this thread despite me not going along with programming languages .. Now ,  I wish I could go back in time and rewind it.. Hihi ~ .  I'll stick to what Ik bout electrical side (not electronics and the likely ones )  ::) .
 

I pegged you for a cse student... My bad.
Well you should know about assembly language.. Right kiddo?
 

I was talking about the other way around.
Obviously I know that we need float for decimal number.

As for type casting, it's fine where necessary, but I'd rather not do so too often for performance reason.
 
???????? said:
I was talking about the other way around.
Obviously I know that we need float for decimal number.

As for type casting, it's fine where necessary, but I'd rather not do so too often for performance reason.
Click to expand...

Newbies wouldn't get confused. That's what I meant to say about decimal stuff. Yeah. That's why I said, is not efficient.
I would rather declare the type beforehand
 
Claraviolet said:
I pegged you for a cse student... My bad.
Well you should know about assembly language.. Right kiddo?
Click to expand...
Hihi .. Let's just say I am away from it all ~ . I know 4 languages and there aint no computer languages in that , Nee san .
 
Sase said:
Hihi .. Let's just say I am away from it all ~ . I know 4 languages and there aint no computer languages in that , Nee san .
Click to expand...


I am curious. What are the languages that you know? By any chance are you talking about spoken languages here?
 
Star_Of_Hope said:
I am curious. What are the languages that you know? By any chance are you talking about spoken languages here?
Click to expand...
[font=Tahoma, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif]Yeah .. spoken languages of course, Star San ::D . Tamil , Kannada , English , Japnese ( I can understand and reply back to a certain extent ) .. I know a couple of others too . But these four better than the rest of the half baked ones.[/font]
 
Claraviolet said:
Newbies wouldn't get confused. That's what I meant to say about decimal stuff. Yeah. That's why I said, is not efficient.
I would rather declare the type beforehand
Click to expand...

Yes, that's a valid reason, until you realise the person in question has yet to learn what "int" and "float" as being a word mean.
That has been the case for me when I started programming in C++ (I did PHP before that, so there's no type definition there).

I also had an explanation from someone who pretended to be an ace programmer about what "float" meant.
He said like "it enables enemies in games to avoid your bullets, because they can float over them".
I went like:
16615604.jpg


Sase said:
Japnese ( I can understand and reply back to a certain extent ) ..
Click to expand...

?????
????????????Sase?????????????
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top